Powered By Blogger

Aug 1, 2014

Global Health Security – Why does it Matter?

http://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/healthprotection/fieldupdates/pdf/dghp-field-updates-2014-summer.pdf 




The globalization of travel and trade of foods and drugs has increased opportunities for dangerous pathogens, which can arise anywhere in the world, to spread faster than ever. This poses serious threats to the United States as well as to other countries. We face a perfect storm of infectious disease threats that know no borders. New and deadly pathogens, such as H7N9 avian influenza and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), are emerging with increased frequency and these diseases can travel across the globe in less than 24 hours. 
READ MORE:
http://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/healthprotection/fieldupdates/pdf/dghp-field-updates-2014-summer.pdf



High Level Meeting of the Global Polio Partners Group at WHO



CHAIRS’ STATEMENT

High Level Meeting of the Global Polio Partners Group (PPG)
Monday, 16 June 2014

On 16 June 2014, a high-level meeting of the Polio Partners Group of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) was convened in Geneva at the World Health Organization headquarters where stakeholders re-affirmed their commitment to follow through on the Endgame strategy for achieving polio eradication. Emphasis was placed on the need to strengthen outbreak prevention and response efforts, on actions being taken to actively keep the three endemic countries on track to stop transmission of the polio virus, and on the implementation of measures to vaccinate travellers from key infected countries under the International Health Regulations. Attention was devoted to initiatives aimed at further enhancing program oversight and governance, on the critical role of communications and social mobilization in tackling remaining obstacles to eradication, on plans to introduce the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV), on the development of the global polio legacy framework, and on financial and budget matters. Participants formally endorsed the revised GPEI monitoring framework for the Eradication and Endgame Strategic Plan 2013-2018.
During the high level meeting, PPG stakeholders:

 Expressed concern at recent backward trends, underscored the need to avoid complacency and pessimism, and reiterated the need to remain focused on effectively responding to the challenges highlighted in the recent Independent Monitoring Board report, including by collaborating to:
1) sustain the positive momentum in Nigeria and Afghanistan in 2014, including by ensuring focused attention during Nigeria’s upcoming elections period and Afghanistan’s own political transition;
2) support Pakistan in reshaping its program so it can achieve success; and
3) strengthen outbreak prevention and response, including in “Red List” countries at risk.

 Called on the GPEI Polio Oversight Board (POB) to brief PPG stakeholders at their Fall meeting on steps taken to enhance outbreak prevention and management efforts.

 Stressed the need for GPEI and GAVI Alliance partners to continue their efforts to reinforce the relationship between polio and routine immunization activities, and noted
Global Polio Partners Group
the consequences of this in relation to IPV introduction and social mobilization campaigns.

 Underscored the importance of communication and social mobilization initiatives to reach missed children and overcome family and community mistrust, and expressed appreciation for sophisticated and detailed analysis provided, while calling on GPEI to show greater alignment between immunization success and investments in social mobilization efforts.

 Expressed appreciation for the planned uptake of IPV in a large number of GAVI-eligible countries. Stakeholders recalled the need for countries to define their target introduction dates as soon as possible to ensure that sufficient quantities of inactivated polio vaccine are available when required. Stakeholders recommended that the POB pursue targeted follow-up at a high level with non-GAVI-eligible countries by writing to ask that they share their plans for IPV introduction, and they also called for donors to consider providing financial support for the introduction of IPV in these countries.

 Took note of POB plans to enhance its transparency, accountability and stakeholder engagement, and welcomed the update provided on plans for an open and objective management review of the polio program being commissioned by the POB. Stakeholders expressed interest in providing bilateral feedback to the consultants conducting the review, and in being provided interim feedback on the review’s progress during a PPG working level teleconference call possibly to be convened in late August or early September. Stakeholders outlined the importance of this review and requested that the POB present the outcomes of the management review at the Fall PPG meeting.

 Expressed appreciation for the increased transparency provided on financing and budget matters, called for all contributions supporting polio eradication to be reflected in GPEI financial reporting (in addition to financial contributions channelled through WHO and UNICEF and reported in Financial Resource Requirements), sought additional clarifications and precision regarding funding gap analysis, and recommended that GPEI assist donors in further highlighting contributions made and the use of innovative financing mechanisms, including through reaching out to the global media and social media.

 Acknowledged the progress achieved in the development of the Global Legacy Framework, expressed interest in providing input during the consultation process, and
considered the value of convening a working level workshop in Geneva in the fall. The PPG Co-Chairs committed to revert to stakeholders with possible dates.

 Endorsed the revised GPEI Monitoring Framework, expressing appreciation for the consultation process that was conducted in advance of the presentation to the PPG. The framework is seen as having the potential to enable a more comprehensive tracking of the program’s progress and results and as being more relevant for key external stakeholders, including to ensure accountability to taxpayers and other stakeholders .
The PPG asked the two Co-Chairs to send the PPG Chairs’ Statement to the GPEI Polio Oversight Board, the Polio Steering Committee, and the Independent Monitoring Board for their consideration and action, and to report on these results at the POB meeting scheduled for June 20, 2014.

Mar 4, 2013

2018 must be the final target for polio eradication

Since the eradication of smallpox in the late 1970s, no other diseases have followed suit; the goal that has come closest so far is eradication of polio. The development of vaccines in the 1950s led to cases of polio plummeting: whereas hundreds of thousands were affected annually in the middle of last century, in 2012 around 250 people were paralysed by the disease.

Aug 29, 2012

The final push for polio: The Lancet Infectious Diseases




The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 591 - 592, August 2012
doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70189-5Cite or Link Using DOI

The final push for polio

Original Text
At first glance, efforts to eradicate poliomyelitis seem in excellent shape. “Epidemiologically, the picture has never looked better”, WHO's Oliver Rosenbauer told TLID. Only 88 cases have been reported in 2012, a favourable contrast with the 252 cases reported by same time last year. India has been free of poliomyelitis since January, 2011, which resolves any lingering questions about the technical feasibility of eradication. Of the three countries classified by WHO as having re-established transmission, Angola has not had a case since mid-2011; the Democratic Republic of the Congo has not had a case since December, 2011; and Chad has only had four cases thus far in 2012—the same period in 2011 had 82 cases.
Elsewhere, outside of the remaining three endemic countries—Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Nigeria—no cases of poliomyelitis have been reported. Moreover, Pakistan has registered a mere 22 cases this year; by this time in 2011, it had registered 58. Wild poliovirus type 2 was eradicated in 1999, and the introduction of monovalent vaccines in 2005, and bivalent vaccines in 2009, provided additional impetus to the global fight for eradication (the new vaccines are roughly three-times as effective as the trivalent vaccine). The strategic plan of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative for 2010—12 aims to cease transmission of the poliovirus by the end of this year. “It would be premature to entirely rule out achieving the end-2012 milestone”, noted the authors of Every Missed Child, a report released by the initiative's independent monitoring board.
Yet, when the World Health Assembly met in May, 2012, it adopted a resolution declaring “the completion of poliovirus eradication a programmatic emergency for global public health”. Meanwhile, experts—including the authors of the independent monitoring board report—routinely use the term crisis when describing the present state of eradication efforts. Why?
There are two key reasons. First, the massive funding gap. The polio campaign for 2012—13 needs a budget of US$2·2 billion, but current funding falls short by $945 million. Thus, 68 campaigns in 33 countries have had to be cancelled. If the money is not provided, 94 million children, mostly in west and central Africa, will not be immunised. In view of the virus's persistence in Nigeria, notes Every Missed Child, “the risk of an explosive return of polio in Nigeria and west Africa is ever-present and raises the chilling spectre of many deaths and a huge financial outlay to regain control”. The global financial benefit of polio eradication has been estimated at $40—50 billion.
The second issue is the absence of meaningful progress, particularly in endemic countries but also in African nations with re-established transmission. Cumulatively, these countries have an estimated 2·7 million children younger than 5 years who have not received even one dose of vaccine. Even more children have been insufficiently vaccinated. If not addressed, the consequences could be severe. “We're seeing all over the world a build up of young adults who were never exposed to poliovirus, because polio has been eradicated from their area and there have been declining vaccination coverage levels”, explains Rosenbauer. “If poliovirus gets in this group, there could be some really devastating outbreaks, far deadlier than we have seen in the past.” Mathematical modelling suggests the possibility of incidences of 200 000 cases per year within the next decade, wiping out nearly all the gains of the 24 years since the international community committed to eradication of polio.
In west Africa, for example, insecurity in Mali, the food crisis in the Sahel, and the onset of the rainy season means that population movement is greater than normal. Nigeria has already seen 52 cases this year; two-thirds of the global burden and a sharp increase compared with the same period in 2011. Couple this rise with the scaled-back vaccination campaigns in neighbouring countries and children in the region are particularly vulnerable. An immunisation campaign in the highest risk areas of Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger was done earlier this month, but a more comprehensive endeavour would be preferable.
Fortunately, problems within the endemic countries should be resolvable. Crucially, polio is not evenly distributed across the three nations. In Afghanistan, it is concentrated in ten high-risk districts in the troubled southern provinces of Helmand and Kandahar. In Pakistan, the disease is concentrated in Gaddap in Karachi, Pishin district in Quetta, and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas bordering Afghanistan. In Nigeria, polio persists in four northern states.
All three countries have issued national emergency action plans, which aim to involve civil society as well as the public sector, much as India did. “The leadership at the top is engaged, in Pakistan in particular we've seen tremendous support from the government at the highest level”, notes Carol Pandak (Rotary International) however, the difficulty is in translating that support to the lower levels. Resistance to immunisation campaigns can be ameliorated by engagment with religious and community leaders—as UNICEF has done in Nigeria, and Rotary International did in India and is attempting in Pakistan. Even the decision by the Taleban to ban vaccinators from some parts of Pakistan need not be insurmountable. “We've been faced with these challenges before”, Pandak points out, “and with the right negotiation they can be overcome.”
Click to toggle image size
Click to toggle image size
Full-size image (68K) Rotary International
Countries striving to eradicate polio should look to India for inspiration
Security issues—in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Nigeria's Borno state—complicate matters. “In Afghanistan, the programme sometimes has to try to access kids during periods of deep instability”, explains Nicholas Grassly (Imperial College London, UK). “Those periods of access are quite variable and some years there will only be a limited amount of times that those kids are accessible.”
Nonetheless, Rosenbauer points out that accessibility is actually increasing in Afghanistan: by March, 2012, only 5% of children were inaccessible, compared with 30% at the beginning of 2011. Yet vaccine coverage in both Afghanistan and Pakistan has decreased over the past few years. “That tells us that the problems are probably more to do with management of the campaigns, operational issues and so forth.” It is a common theme. In Pakistan, for example, polio is concentrated within Pashto-speaking communities. Progress can be made by ensuring vaccinators are the same ethnic origin, speak the same language, and include women on their teams. The independent monitoring board's report praised Pakistan—which it had previously criticised for having a “deeply dysfunctional programme”—for its “revitalised energy and augmented national emergency plan fit for the purpose of stopping polio transmission”.
Experts agree that countries striving to eradicate polio should look to India for inspiration. The Indian Government offered strong support; migrant groups were identified and targeted with immunisation campaigns; large numbers of technical staff were trained and deployed (Nigeria has enacted a huge surge of technical staff—WHO alone has increased the number of its staff in the country from 744 to 2950—and the country has also started using global positioning system technology to help map communities); and an advanced surveillance system was established. “Afghanistan, Nigeria, and Pakistan have all put in place plans that can turn the situation around”, Rosenbauer says firmly. “But we're at crisis point until those plans are fully implemented, and we need funding, otherwise we will see the international spread of polio.”

Jul 30, 2012

GAIT Disturbance: Types and differences

Types and differences of gait disturbances

There are a great number of different gait disturbances. Some are specifically characteristic of particular conditions, and some may be seen with many problems. Gait disturbances are generally either structural or neurological. However, there may be significant overlap. Types of gait disturbances that may frequently result from either structural or neurological causes include:

Ataxic gait. A staggering, unsteady and uncoordinated gait typically caused by abnormalities of the nervous system. A variation of this is the tabetic gait, a high-stepping ataxic gait where the feet slap the ground.
Toe-walking gait. This is a common gait disturbance in which the patient walks on the toes. A variation on this is the equine gait, which is a high-stepping toe-walking gait.

Steppage gait. Commonly seen with foot drop, where the foot appears to hang limp at the ankle. The foot is lifted high so that the toes do not drag on the ground and the toes touch ground first. The hip and knee are typically bent more than normal in order to clear the toes from the ground.
Types of gait disturbances that are typically structural only include:
Limp. A jerky, uneven gait that may be caused by pain, weakness or deformity. Antalgic gait, a type of limp, is the most common gait disturbance. It is caused by pain and compensates for that pain by keeping weight off of a painful part as much as possible.
 
Spastic gait. A stiff gait where the toes catch and drag, the legs are held together and the hips and knees are kept in a slightly bent position.
 
Hemiplegic gait. This gait is characteristic of paralysis or weakness in one leg and is common after a stroke. The patient swings the paralyzed leg around to bring the foot in front. This gait avoids placing weight on the affected leg.
 
Senile gait. This gait is usually seen in the elderly. It is associated with a stooped posture, with knees and hips bent. Arm swinging is lessened and there is stiffness in turning. Steps are small and broad-based.
 
Waddling gait. The feet are held wide apart and the patient walks somewhat like a duck. This is a common gait disturbance in late pregnancy
 
Types of gait disturbances that are typically neurological only include: Fascinating gait. In this gait disturbance, the patient walks on the toes as if being pushed. Steps start slowly and increase in speed. Often, the patient cannot stop until grasping or running into something.
 
Parkinson’s gait. This is a form of fascinating gait characteristic of Parkinson’s disease. Steps are short and shuffling, with feet scrapping the ground. They start slow and build up speed. The patient’s upper body is bent forward, head down, and arms, elbows, hips and knees are bent.
 
Magnetic gait. Also called glue-footed gait. The patient seems to have difficulty taking the first step, as though the feet had been glued to the ground. Once the first step is made, subsequent steps are small and shuffling.
 
Double-step gait. In this gait disturbance, alternating steps are made of different length or rate. The stride of one side does not match the other.
 
Helicopod gait. The patient swings one or both feet in a half circle with each step.
 
Scissor gait. In this gait, the legs cross in walking. The left leg moves too far to the right and the right leg moves too far to the left.

Dr. Sabin in India

Dr. Sabin's trip to India
Near:
S G Barve Mg, Kurla, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Date:
January 1963 


Jul 19, 2011

Why India can't feed its people, asks Canadian media

, On Monday 18 July 2011, 9:11 AM
Toronto, July 18 (IANS) In this Year of India in Canada, India is making news in the media here - not for the second highest growth rate in the world but for its 'absolute poverty'' and failure to 'feed its people.''
The Canadian media has also likened 'the boom in Bihar' to 'a whimper'.
Writing under the headline 'Why India can't feed its people,' the country's biggest daily Toronto Star reported from New Delhi Sunday, 'Food is an all-consuming crisis here. Waste is only one facet. Agriculture, infrastructure, inflation, innovation and corruption are others. It is a scourge and challenge for this country of 1.2 billion people...''

Stepping up European measles surveillance

Stepping up European measles surveillance
Article published on 14 July 2011

For many years Eurosurveillance has made it a point to publish articles on measles outbreaks and measles prevention and control in Europe. The purpose has always been to increase awareness about this dangerous and potentially fatal infectious disease and highlight opportunities for preventive measures.
Full article available at: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19917
Regards...

Jul 3, 2011

RUTF: Ready to Use Therapeutic Food



All children with severe acute malnutrition do not require hospital admission except those suffering from complications. Home-based management with Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food (RUTF) has been found to be associated with better outcome than standard therapy in the hospital.

Nutritional Challenges in Adolescent Girl


Adolescents are in the process of establishing responsibility for their own health-related behaviors, including diet. It is an appropriate time for health promotion behavior.